And the future engineers are tho ones who order new software. In my opinion that is a good solution for both sides of the party, because students have the ability to learn and improve knowledge on the field of CAD and CAM without doing something illegal, and software providers, get money and bring up a big amount of well trained and conditioneds users of their software. for widely spreaded Nurbs modellers or FEA softwares, to mention just a few are available for viable prices. My thread was just a question not a critical or demanding oneĪnyway educational licenses e.g. It is the goal of studiing to make yourself the best education possible.īut for sure education is often a question of money. not the responsibility of the industryīut that is not the reality, I know many students who would like to learn how to use and work with common software, may be out of personal interests, personal training, to have better chances at applications, or as it is in my case to find software to take part at a yacht design competition. It is heatedly argued, that it´s the universities and schools responsibility to allocate licenses for the tools which are used at the ship building market. It doesn´t have to be discussed or it is not the expectation of any student as I suppose, to get anything for freeĪnd It is not my wish to get Maxsurf for free, everything has its price.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |